AN ANNIVERSARY PROJECT
2017 is the twentieth anniversary of the landmark 1997 Runnymede Trust Report Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All. A project is being planned to mark the anniversary. The aims of the project are:
- to renew awareness of the causes, nature, facets and dangers of Islamophobia
- to help develop and strengthen counter-narratives relating to citizenship, secularism, pluralism and justice
- to provide resources, lesson plans, activities and course outlines for schools, colleges, universities and communities, and for training and awareness-raising events of various kinds.
THREE PRINCIPAL STRANDS
The project has three strands:
- LOOKING BACK, LOOKING AHEAD: public lectures and events in Leeds and London to mark the twentieth anniversary of the 1997 report – 19 October 2017 in London and 12 November 2017 in Leeds.
- BLOGPOSTS: critique, reaction and responses hosted by ReOrient: The Journal of Critical Muslim Studies.
- RESOURCING EDUCATORS: an archive of lesson plans, exercises, training programmes and course outlines. September/November 2017.
If you would like to contribute to the blog or the resources archive, or both, please send an indication of your interest to firstname.lastname@example.org. Also, please send suggestions and requests, if you wish, about the specific topics and issues you hope this project will address.
The project is being organised jointly by the Centre for Ethnicity and Racism Studies at the University of Leeds, the Insted Consultancy, the Muslim Youthwork Foundation and ReOrient: The Journal of Critical Muslim Studies.
The current members of the planning group for the project are Sameena Choudry (Equitable Education consultancy), Gill Cressey (Coventry University), MG Khan (Ruskin College, Oxford), Robin Richardson (formerly at the Runnymede Trust), S.Sayyid (University of Leeds) and AbdoolKarim Vakil (King’s College London).
The project focuses on the situation in the UK, as did the report published 20 years ago. But it also takes account of scholarship, issues, activism and creative developments in other countries as well.
The 1997 Runnymede report can be accessed via the following link: http://www.runnymedetrust.org/companies/17/74/Islamophobia-A-Challenge-for-Us-All.html.
A follow-up report published by Trentham Books in 2004 can be found at http://www.insted.co.uk/islambook.pdf
Many key theoretical issues are discussed in Thinking through Islamophobia: global perspectives, edited by S. Sayyid and AbdoolKarim Vakil, Hurst Publishers 2011.
The project has a Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/Islamophobia2017
A website is being built at http://islamophobia2017.org.uk/
A poster about the project can be downloaded from http://www.islamophobia2017.org.uk/pdf/islamophobia2017-finalweb.pdf
‘We’re out!’, they crowed, we’re out and proud,
self-styled ‘real people’, triumphant and loud.
Thus began a meditation at a conference last week on development education. The meditation continued:
They’d got their country back, their turf and their ways,
the ones known by their forebears in good old days,
when foreigners everywhere, whatever their race,
were neither here nor uppity, knowing their place.
The meditation can be read in full at http://www.insted.co.uk/meditation.pdf
In the years since the collapse of the Celtic Tiger economy there has been a significant increase in Irish migration to Britain. However, little is known about the experiences of these post-tiger, post-peace agreement migrants. How might their experiences differ from earlier waves of Irish migrants to Britain?
In an attempt to gain a deeper insight into the experiences of migrants who have arrived in Britain since 2008, a study is to be carried out by the Social Policy Research Centre at Middlesex University, in partnership with the Federation of Irish Societies. The study will focus on teachers and will be directed by Professor Louise Ryan. There is preliminary information and a brief interview with her at http://leftcentral.org.uk/2013/05/20/ireland-the-land-of-scholars/#more-3422.
David Goodhart’s book The British Dream is a work of polemical journalism and reportage, not of scholarship, and has strengths and weaknesses accordingly. The strengths are that there are many anecdotes and striking phrases, and there’s relatively little jargon. The weaknesses are that over-simplification is commoner than thoughtful and tentative nuance, and that too many facts and quotations are left unreferenced and therefore uncheckable. The book is reviewed for the Insted consultancy at http://leftcentral.org.uk/2013/05/16/dreaming-of-one-nation-labour-multiculturalism-and-race/
Although aimed essentially at the centre left of the political spectrum, where it has been well received by, for example, Jon Cruddas in the New Statesman, and where it chimes well with Labour’s One Nation rhetoric, the book is likely to be read also, and with an even warmer welcome, on the centre right.
The book’s valuable features include its insistence that issues of race and immigration should be rationally not emotively discussed, and that discussions should centrally include narratives, understandings and dreams about national identity and national history, and concepts of imagined community and emotional citizenship. Within this context Goodhart refers from time to time to Danny Boyle’s pageant at the opening of the 2012 Olympic Games as an iconic and vivid illustration of what the concept of One Nation can mean in practice. ‘When a country is changing very fast,’ he says, ‘it needs stories to reassure and guide it’, stories which are ‘about connecting majority to minority and old to new’.
The book’s unfortunate and disappointing features include its caricatures of multiculturalism, and of thinkers such as Bhikhu Parekh and Tariq Modood who have devoted their careers to thinking in depth about how multicultural societies such as Britain have developed; the weakness of its references to the importance of law and legislation; its embracing, in effect, of a Daily Express view of British Islam and British Muslims; its uncritical endorsement of the view that ‘humans are group-based primates who favour their own and extend trust to outsiders with caution’; its insufficient attention to the global and international context and to relevant issues of gender and social class; and its disinclination to consider the continuing influence of racisms in their various forms (behavioural/attitudinal; colour/cultural; personal/institutional; crude/subtle; street/dinner-table).
Goodhart describes himself at one point as a member of ‘the political tribe of north London liberals’. His dream is indeed that of such a person. For others, though, in view of the shallow generalisations and stereotypes on which it is built, it has the elements of a nightmare.
Twenty years ago today (23 April) the Runnymede Trust published Equality Assurance in Schools. During the launch conference that morning we received news of a murder that had taken place in Greenwich late the previous evening. Amongst other things, the conference wrote a joint letter of condolence and solidarity to the parents and family of the murdered young man. The murder led in due course to the Stephen Lawrence Report by Sir William Macpherson, which in its turn led to the race equality duty (RED) in the Race Relations Amendment Act. The implications of the Lawrence report and of the new legislation for schools were considered in a lecture for the Society of Education Officers in summer 2001. Entitled ‘The Devil is in the Detail and in the Big Picture Too’, the lecture is re-published today at http://www.insted.co.uk/devil-in-detail.pdf.